The list of things these documents ask for is short and it repeats — with three exceptions that are not paperwork at all. This page collects what is named, at which stage, and how long each contract allows on either side.
Once a check starts, the question becomes what has to be sent and how long there is to send it. Both answers sit in the same contracts that feed best anonymous crypto casinos, and they are far more uniform than the triggers are: the list of documents barely changes from operator to operator, while the clock changes completely.
Government-issued photo identification appears in nearly every document read. Rocketpot names a photocopy of an ID or a passport at clause 11.8. Bitcasino.io names valid photographic identification at clauses 6.5 and 5. Thunderpick's clause 21.1 names government-issued ID. Jack.com's clause 10 wants any paperwork submitted in Latin or Cyrillic script, and lists ID, payment-system records and utility bills among the items. Wild Fortune names a passport or driver's licence across clauses 8.4, 9.3, 9.5, 11.2 and 18.1.
Proof of address appears in most of them. Bitsler's help pages are the most specific in the record: a utility bill for internet, electricity or phone, or a bank extract, no older than three months, with all four corners visible along with the name, the address and the company logo. Thunderpick names proof of residency. Bitcasino.io names proof of address, and adds a document confirming ownership of the payment instrument at clause 6.5.
A selfie holding the identity document appears in three. Rainbet names it across clauses 20.1, 5.2 and 8.3. Wild Fortune names a photo or screenshot verifying the current address. Vave's clause 8.7 names a selfie among the items it may ask for.
Two documents name nothing specific at all. Wolfbet's clause 5 §1 mentions KYC/AML paperwork and an identity check but never lists one item by name. Metaspins' clause 9.7 points to KYC documentation and checks run by a third party, again with no list attached. Both are recorded as unread rather than as none: the operator may well have a list, and it is not in the text that was opened.
A drawing of the list on this page, read as a grid. Every filled cell carries the clause the item was found at, so a row can be checked against the operator own document; the two rows with no cells at all are the two contracts that name no item. This is a reading of ten documents between 25 August and 2 September 2026, not a screen from any of them.
Three requests that are not paperwork
A live conversation. Vave's clause 8.7 counts a phone call and a live video call among the things it may ask for. Wild Fortune reaches for the same tools when Latin or Cyrillic paperwork isn't available: a call to the number on file, or a video check where the player holds up the document and reads out a name and date. Rainbet's document list sits alongside a verification call in that same set of clauses.
A security question. Thunderpick's clause 21.1 reserves the right, at its sole discretion and only in certain cases, to put one or more security questions to a player. Nothing else in the record works quite this way.
A signature from a wallet. Among the things Rocketpot's clause 11.8 may require is a signed message from whichever wallet address an early deposit came from — proof tied to the wallet, not the person, and workable only because of the properties described on coin and network. No personal document changes hands here, which makes it the site's clearest illustration of the gap between identity paperwork and what an operator can see without asking.
The clock, where a document sets one
A drawing, not a screen: the deadline in each of the five documents that sets one, measured on a single scale in days from the request. The bottom bar is the only limit any of the ten documents puts on its own side, Rainbet at clause 20.1. Every bar comes from the clause number printed beside it, read between 25 August and 2 September 2026.
Five of the ten give the player a deadline. Rainbet's clause 20.1 gives 72 hours. Vave's clause 8.7 gives fourteen days. Wild Fortune's clauses 8.4 and 9.3 give two weeks counted from the withdrawal request, and add that failing to reach the player inside that window gets the account locked and the withdrawal scrapped. Metaspins' clause 9.10 gives thirty days — and if nothing else arrives, it asks only that the request be acknowledged within that span. Rocketpot's clause 12.2 gives thirty calendar days.
Exactly one gives itself a deadline in return. Rainbet's clause 20.1 says the verification process may take up to seven business days to be analysed. Every other document in the record sets no limit on the operator's own side, which makes the asymmetry the most consistent finding on this page: five contracts bind the player to a date and one binds the company.
The other five set nothing in either direction. Bitcasino.io, Bitsler, Wolfbet, Thunderpick and Jack.com name no period for supplying documents in the text that was read. That is recorded as unstated, never as unlimited — a document that is silent has not granted anything.
Where the documents go, and what the same contracts say about that
Two of the ten name the party doing the checking. Bitsler says account verification is handled by a third-party service called Veriff, and describes two phases — identity verification always, proof of address on some occasions. Metaspins' clause 9.7 refers to third-party checks without naming the provider.
That detail matters more than it looks. It means the answer to “who ends up holding the passport photograph” is not always the operator whose terms are being read, and the operator's own document is the only place a reader will find that stated at all.
Reading a request before it arrives
The stage decides the surprise. A request that arrives at the withdrawal is the one most readers expect. A request that arrives before a first bet — Wild Fortune's BTC gate at clause 2.7 — is the one that catches people out, and it is visible in the contract long before it is visible in an account. The full ordering is on the triggers page.
The deadline decides the cost. Seventy-two hours and thirty days are both real answers, and they ask for very different amounts of attention. A document that names neither is asking the reader to keep an unbounded window open, which is worth knowing before rather than after.
And the consequence decides everything else. What each contract provides for when documents are not supplied, or are supplied and not accepted, is set out on failed verification. The states these deadlines belong to are defined on the three states page.
What this page does not contain
No advice on how to satisfy a check faster, no template, and no ranking of operators by how little they ask for. The list above is a reading of ten contracts on the dates given, and the rules that produced it are on the method page. The document list above is identical for every operator in list of the best anonymous crypto casinos; what changes from row to row is the clock, not the paperwork. The vocabulary — proof of address, source of funds, enhanced due diligence — is defined in the glossary.
